Dollar Outlook: Can the Rally Continue?

Investors holding foreign assets with exposure to the U.S. dollar have had a volatile ride year to date: up in Q1, down in Q2, and back up in Q3. Now that the dollar is near the year’s highs, can the rally continue? We believe it can in the near term, although our longer-term view is more nuanced. Here’s what we see ahead.

 Multiple factors support dollar strength in the near term

Although the dollar is near its year-to-date high, it is likely to get support over the next year from relatively high U.S. interest rates—at least, compared with those of other major developed countries—expectations for tighter Federal Reserve policy, and the slowing in global growth.

The dollar is just below this year’s high

The US Federal Reserve Trade-Weighted Nominal Dollar Index was at 113.6 points as of August 27, slightly below its year-to-date high of 114.8 points.

Source: Bloomberg. Shows U.S. Federal Reserve Trade-Weighted Nominal Dollar Index (USTWBGD Index),a measure of the value of the U.S. dollar relative to other global currencies. Daily data as of 8/27/2021. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

1. U.S. interest rates are high relative to global rates.

So far during 2021, the dollar’s strength has been driven largely by the rise in U.S. interest rates relative to those in other major developed countries. Although U.S. yields are low in real terms—that is, adjusted for inflation—that hasn’t been enough to push the dollar lower. It appears that the market is viewing the recent inflation spike as transitory. Moreover, in the yield-starved world of government bonds, even the paltry yields on U.S. Treasuries look attractive.

U.S. yields are above other major developed-country yields

As of August 26, 2021, the U.S. 10-year Treasury bond yield was 1.35%, higher than government bond yields in Canada, Italy, the U.K., Japan, France, Switzerland and Germany.

Source: Bloomberg. Data as of 8/26/2021. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

We compared the 10-year U.S. government bond yield to the average 10-year government bond yield in major developed markets. Barring dollar liquidity crises, the interest rate differential has had a strong relationship with the direction of the dollar—typically rising and falling in tandem. The interest rate differential is currently providing support for a stronger dollar, as it is above 1% and increasing.

Interest rate differentials historically drive the direction of the dollar

The 10-year interest rate differential and the Federal Reserve Trade-Weighted Dollar Index historically have tended to move in similar directions.

Source: Bloomberg. Weekly data as of 8/20/2021. The 10-year interest rate differential compares the U.S. government bond yields with those of Germany, Canada, Japan, the U.K., Switzerland, Australia and Sweden. U.S. Federal Reserve Trade-Weighted Nominal Dollar Index (USTWBGD Index). Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

2. Global central bank policies should support the dollar. The dollar moved higher over the summer as markets expected the Fed to begin tapering its asset purchases in the months ahead. In a speech at the Fed’s annual Economic Policy Symposium in Jackson Hole, Wyo., in August, Fed Chair Jerome Powell prepped the markets for a tapering announcement later this year—but the dollar dropped on indications that Fed rate hikes might not follow the end of its quantitative-easing program as quickly as expected.

However, with the Fed’s policy rate higher than the currently negative policy rates of the Bank of Japan (BOJ) and the European Central Bank (ECB), support for the dollar should remain intact for the near term. The bottom line: Once tapering is complete in 2022, as is currently expected, the Fed will have more flexibility to raise short-term rates based on the outlook for inflation and the labor market. By comparison, other major central banks appear likely to maintain easy policies.

The Fed’s policy rate is above those of other major central banks

The Federal Reserve policy rate is 0.13%, versus 0.10% for the Bank of England, negative 0.10% for the Bank of Japan, and negative 0.50% for the European Central Bank.

Source: Bloomberg. Data reflects the Fed’s federal funds rate upper target, the BOE official bank rate, the BOJ policy rate balance rate, and the ECB deposit facility announcement rate. Data as of 8/30/2021.

3. Declining global growth prospects may weigh on emerging-market (EM) currencies.

The dollar has moved up relative to EM currencies on signs that the pace of global growth is slowing. China’s regulatory and credit policies have rippled through Asian EM countries. The decline in credit growth and increased regulatory control of some industries have led to slower economic growth and contributed to a drop in commodity prices. China’s credit impulse tracks the growth rate of credit in China—as of July, the year-over-year growth rate in credit was -5.29%. The decline is likely to weigh on the Chinese yuan (CNY) relative to the U.S. dollar.

China’s new-credit growth rate has slowed

The year-over-year China credit impulse growth rate was negative 5.29% as of July 2021.

Source: Bloomberg, Bloomberg Economics China Credit Impulse 12-Month Net Change (CHBGREVA Index). The credit impulse is the change in new credit issued as a proportion of gross domestic product. Monthly data as of July 2021.

Given that China is a top trading partner of the U.S., it is the second-highest currency weight in the Fed’s trade-weighted dollar index. This means a weaker CNY translates to a stronger trade-weighted dollar.

China is the second-largest weight in the Fed trade-weighted dollar index

China’s weighting in the Fed’s trade-weighted dollar index is below that of the euro area, but above Mexico, Canada, Japan and the U.K.

Source: Federal Reserve. Federal Reserve’s Broad Trade-Weighted Dollar. Data as of 2021.

The decline in China’s growth also affects emerging-market economies that export commodities to China. Lower commodity purchases translate to lower commodity prices, keeping emerging-market currencies down and the U.S. dollar up.

Over the longer term, the dollar faces some risk

Looking out two to five years, we are less positive. The large budget and current account—or trade—deficits and the prospects for a broader global recovery should put downward pressure on the dollar over the long run.

Widening current account deficits tend to lead to a weaker dollar in the long run

The Fed trade-weighted dollar and the current account balance as a percentage of gross domestic product, advanced 2 years, historically move in similar directions.

Source: Bloomberg. Federal Reserve trade-weighted dollar index and the U.S. current account balance as a percentage of gross domestic product (GDP) (USTWBGD Index, EHCAUS Index). Quarterly data as of March 2021. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

We will be watching yields and portfolio flows for signs that investors are shifting away from dollar-denominated assets in favor of other currencies. If this occurs, the decline in the dollar would provide a boost to international investments. When that time comes, we will change our view accordingly. In the meantime, the dollar is likely to head higher.

What to consider now

We expect the dollar to strengthen moderately over the coming months. A stronger dollar is generally negative for commodity prices and reduces returns on international investments. We are maintaining a neutral view for emerging-market and global (non-USD-denominated) bonds. Whenever yields are at such low, if not negative, levels in the global bond market, performance of the broader index tends to track more closely to the movement in the dollar. The stronger dollar year to date has weighed on the global bond market.

The stronger dollar has led to lackluster returns for global bonds

The total return for the Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate ex-USD Bond Index was negative 3.9% as of August 27, 2021.

Source: Bloomberg. Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate ex-USD Bond Index (LG38TRUU Index). Daily data as of 8/27/2021. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

To be clear, our neutral outlook for international fixed income is not an underweight—it is still important to have exposure to international fixed income to provide diversification to a bond portfolio. We also suggest:

  • Maintain a below-benchmark duration in global bonds (ex-U.S.). It is crucial to keep in mind that the duration, or price sensitivity to rate changes, of global bonds is higher than the broad U.S. aggregate bond index. Be cautious about how much duration is added to the portfolio from the global bond holdings.
  • Look for opportunities to rebalance to the target weight for international fixed income. It is likely that international bonds haven’t kept pace with other fixed income investments this year, leading investors to be underweight. Try to pick up international fixed income bonds at a cheaper price when the spreads over Treasuries rise.
  • Keep expectations in check. The main reason for maintaining a neutral weight to international fixed income is to keep a more diversified bond portfolio and prevent timing the market. As such, international fixed income is unlikely to be the “breadwinner” for your portfolio anytime soon.

Please reach out to a Schwab representative for any questions and more personalized guidance.

Follow Kathy Jones (@KathyJones) on Twitter.

Talk to us about the services that are right for you. Call a Schwab Fixed Income Specialist at 877-566-7982, visit a branch, find a consultant or open an account online.

Explore Schwab’s views on additional fixed income topics in Bond Insights.


Important Disclosures:

The information provided here is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered an individualized recommendation or personalized investment advice. The investment strategies mentioned here may not be suitable for everyone. Each investor needs to review an investment strategy for his or her own particular situation before making any investment decision.

All expressions of opinion are subject to change without notice in reaction to shifting market or economic conditions. Data contained herein from third party providers is obtained from what are considered reliable sources. However, its accuracy, completeness or reliability cannot be guaranteed. Supporting documentation for any claims or statistical information is available upon request.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results and the opinions presented cannot be viewed as an indicator of future performance.

Indexes are unmanaged, do not incur management fees, costs and expenses and cannot be invested in directly. For more information on indexes please see

Currencies are speculative, very volatile and are not suitable for all investors.

Diversification and rebalancing strategies do not ensure a profit and do not protect against losses in declining markets. Rebalancing may cause investors to incur transaction costs and, when a nonretirement account is rebalanced, taxable events may be created that may affect your tax liability.

Fixed income securities are subject to increased loss of principal during periods of rising interest rates. Fixed-income investments are subject to various other risks including changes in credit quality, market valuations, liquidity, prepayments, early redemption, corporate events, tax ramifications and other factors. Lower-rated securities are subject to greater credit risk, default risk, and liquidity risk.

International investments involve additional risks, which include differences in financial accounting standards, currency fluctuations, geopolitical risk, foreign taxes and regulations, and the potential for illiquid markets. Investing in emerging markets may accentuate these risks.

Commodity-related products carry a high level of risk and are not suitable for all investors. Commodity-related products may be extremely volatile, illiquid and can be significantly affected by underlying commodity prices, world events, import controls, worldwide competition, government regulations, and economic condition.

The policy analysis provided by the Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., does not constitute and should not be interpreted as an endorsement of any political party.

Source: Bloomberg Index Services Limited. BLOOMBERG® is a trademark and service mark of Bloomberg Finance L.P. and its affiliates (collectively “Bloomberg”). BARCLAYS® is a trademark and service mark of Barclays Bank Plc (collectively with its affiliates, “Barclays”), used under license. Bloomberg or Bloomberg’s licensors, including Barclays, own all proprietary rights in the Bloomberg Barclays Indices. Neither Bloomberg nor Barclays approves or endorses this material, or guarantees the accuracy or completeness of any information herein, or makes any warranty, express or implied, as to the results to be obtained therefrom and, to the maximum extent allowed by law, neither shall have any liability or responsibility for injury or damages arising in connection therewith.

The Schwab Center for Financial Research is a division of Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.